[link:lorgonblog.wordpress.com]

shows how to differentiate the type and constructor accessibility.

By on 11/28/2010 1:22 PM ()

Well that was simple enough... funny though, cause I've read up on many examples, and never once knew that a second access modifier could come after the type name or type params, or before the constructor param list... Apparently neither does msdn:

from [link:msdn.microsoft.com]

type [access-modifier] type-name [type-params]( parameter-list ) [ as identifier ] =

[ class ]

[ inherit base-type-name(base-constructor-args) ]

[ let-bindings ]

[ do-bindings ]

member-list

...

[ end ]

// Mutually recursive class definitions:

type [access-modifier] type-name1 ...

and [access-modifier] type-name2 ...

...

Where is that second [access-modifier]??? Why isn't it there!?? lol

By on 11/28/2010 1:34 PM ()
IntelliFactory Offices Copyright (c) 2011-2012 IntelliFactory. All rights reserved.
Home | Products | Consulting | Trainings | Blogs | Jobs | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Built with WebSharper